netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] fsl_ucc_hdlc: process the result of hold

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 14:05:59 +0300
From: Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...e.de>
To: Александра Дюпина
 <adiupina@...ralinux.ru>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@....com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fsl_ucc_hdlc: process the result of hold_open()

On 9/1/23 13:48, Александра Дюпина wrote:
> Thanks for the review!
> 
> 28.08.2023 22:38, Jakub Kicinski пишет:
>> Don't you have to undo all the things done prior to hdlc_open()?
> Yes, it looks like I really need to undo everything that was done before hdlc_open().
> But the question arose - would it be enough to call the uhdlc_close(dev) function?

looks like it is.

> In addition, it seems to me and my colleagues that a call to hdlc_close(dev) should be added to the uhdlc_close() function, similar to the 

yes, take a look at the comment for hdlc_close()

following functions:
> 1. drivers/net/wan/n2.c (n2_close function)
> 2. drivers/net/wan/pc300too.c (pc300_close function)
> 3. drivers/net/wan/pci200syn.c (pci200_close function)
> 4. drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c (wanxl_close function)
> Tell me, please, are we wrong?
>