lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230901141905.GJ140739@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 16:19:05 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
Cc: mani@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	quic_viswanat@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: qrtr: Few qrtr fixes

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 03:50:19PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
> Patch #1 fixes a race condition between qrtr driver and ns opening and
> sending data to a control port.
> 
> Patch #2 address the issue with legacy targets sending the SSR
> notifications using DEL_PROC control message.

Hi Sricharan,

if these are fixes then they should be targeted at 'net' rather than
'net-next', and consideration should be given to supplying Fixes tags.

If these are not fixes, then please don't describe them as such.
In this case targeting net-next is correct, but it is currently closed,
as per the form letter below.

In either case please consider:

* Arranging local variables for new Networking code in
  reverse xmas tree order - longest line to shortest

* Avoiding introducing new Sparse warnings


## Form letter - net-next-closed

The merge window for v6.6 has begun and therefore net-next is closed
for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations.
We are currently accepting bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after Sept 11th.

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.

See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle
--
pw-bot: defer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ