netdev - Re: [RFC net-next v2 5/5] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: implement mdo_insert_tx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ba7e5fbb-126f-8240-4784-e8e25e53b8f0@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 17:22:49 +0300
From: "Radu Pirea (OSS)" <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: "atenart@...nel.org" <atenart@...nel.org>, "andrew@...n.ch"
 <andrew@...n.ch>, "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Sebastian Tobuschat <sebastian.tobuschat@....com>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 5/5] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: implement
 mdo_insert_tx_tag



On 01.09.2023 16:57, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2023-09-01, 14:58:12 +0300, Radu Pirea (OSS) wrote:
>> On 01.09.2023 13:07, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
>>>> (the interface was up before)
>>>> [root@...rm ~]# ip link add link end0 macsec0 type macsec encrypt on
>>>> offload phy
>>>> [root@...rm ~]# ip link set end0 down
>>>> [root@...rm ~]# ip macsec add macsec0 rx port 1 address
>>>> 00:01:be:be:ef:33
>>>> RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
>>>
>>> Where does that EOPNOTSUPP come from? nxp_c45_mdo_add_rxsc from this
>>> version of the code can't return that, and macsec_add_rxsc also
>>> shouldn't at this point.
>>
>> This is the source of -EOPNOTSUPP
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/macsec.c#L1928
> 
> Could you check which part of macsec_get_ops is failing? Since
> macsec_newlink with "offload phy" worked, macsec_check_offload
> shouldn't fail, so why does macsec_get_ops return NULL?
> real_dev->phydev was NULL'ed?

This check logical and returns false:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/macsec.c#L343

real_dev->phydev was nulled.
The call stack is next:
fec_enet_close -> phy_disconnect -> phy_detach ->
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c#L1815

-- 
Radu P.