[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230905222945.h7tuzlraxdp5imbh@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 01:29:45 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
Cc: Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, davem@...emloft.net,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@...rochip.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net v4] net: phy: Provide Module 4 KSZ9477 errata (DS80000754C)
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:33:15AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> @@ -1847,6 +1844,12 @@ static int ksz9477_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> return err;
> }
>
> + /* According to KSZ9477 Errata DS80000754C (Module 4) all EEE modes
> + * in this switch shall be regarded as broken.
> + */
> + if (phydev->dev_flags & MICREL_NO_EEE)
> + phydev->eee_broken_modes = -1;
I know this is just another quick'n'dirty code snippet exchanged over
email which turned into a proper patch, but wouldn't it be more
civilized to use "MDIO_EEE_100TX | MDIO_EEE_1000T" here, than to declare
EEE broken for link modes which aren't even supported by the internal
switch PHYs?
It's probably not causing practical harm, but currently, we tell
genphy_config_eee_advert() to include reserved bits of the MMD EEE
Advertising Register (MMD 0x07 : 0x3C) into its modification mask.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists