[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPcDAk81DAqevy43@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 13:29:22 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: sdf@...gle.com, axboe@...nel.dk, asml.silence@...il.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
krisman@...e.de, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@...alicyn.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] net/socket: Break down __sys_getsockopt
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 09:24:57AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Split __sys_getsockopt() into two functions by removing the core
> logic into a sub-function (do_sock_getsockopt()). This will avoid
> code duplication when doing the same operation in other callers, for
> instance.
>
> do_sock_getsockopt() will be called by io_uring getsockopt() command
> operation in the following patch.
>
> The same was done for the setsockopt pair.
...
> + ops = READ_ONCE(sock->ops);
> + if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
> + err = sk_getsockopt(sock->sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
> + } else if (unlikely(!ops->getsockopt)) {
> + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + } else {
> + if (WARN_ONCE(optval.is_kernel || optlen.is_kernel,
> + "Invalid argument type"))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + err = ops->getsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval.user,
> + optlen.user);
> + }
Can be written as
} else if (WARN_ONCE(optval.is_kernel || optlen.is_kernel,
"Invalid argument type"))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
} else {
err = ops->getsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval.user,
optlen.user);
}
With that done, the {} are not needed anymore.
> + if (!compat) {
if (compat)
return err;
> + max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
> + err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock->sk, level, optname,
> + optval, optlen, max_optlen,
> + err);
return ... ?
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists