netdev - Re: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix page pool cache index corruption.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 12:15:27 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
	Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
	Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
	Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"hawk@...nel.org" <hawk@...nel.org>,
	"alexander.duyck@...il.com" <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	"ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org" <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
	"linyunsheng@...wei.com" <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix page pool cache
 index corruption.

On 2023-09-07 08:15:58 [+0000], Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix page pool cache index
> > corruption.
> > >  	cq->refill_task_sched = false;
> > > +
> > > +	local_bh_disable();
> > > +	napi_schedule(wrk->napi);
> > > +	local_bh_enable();
> > 
> > This is a nitpick since I haven't look how it works exactly: Is it possible that the
> > wrk->napi pointer gets overwritten by
> > otx2_napi_handler() since you cleared cq->refill_task_sched() earlier?
> I don’t see any issue here.  As NAPI and workqueue execution is serialized (as interrupt is disabled when 
> Workqueue is scheduled).  I don’t think we can move "refill_task_sched = false" after local_bh_enable(). 
> But we can move refill_task_sched = false as below . but I don’t see a need. 

Right, there might be no issue I was just asking. I don't know how the
cq <-> NAPI mapping is working. If you say that there is no race/issue,
okay ;)

>  +
>  +	local_bh_disable();
>  +	napi_schedule(wrk->napi);
>   +	cq->refill_task_sched = false;
>  +	local_bh_enable();

Sebastian