netdev - [PATCH net v2] net: ipv4: fix one memleak in __inet_del

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 10:57:09 +0800
From: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
To: <ja@....bg>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<hadi@...erus.ca>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <liujian56@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] net: ipv4: fix one memleak in __inet_del_ifa()

I got the below warning when do fuzzing test:
unregister_netdevice: waiting for bond0 to become free. Usage count = 2

It can be repoduced via:

ip link add bond0 type bond
sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.bond0.promote_secondaries=1
ip addr add 4.117.174.103/0 scope 0x40 dev bond0
ip addr add 192.168.100.111/255.255.255.254 scope 0 dev bond0
ip addr add 0.0.0.4/0 scope 0x40 secondary dev bond0
ip addr del 4.117.174.103/0 scope 0x40 dev bond0
ip link delete bond0 type bond

In this reproduction test case, an incorrect 'last_prim' is found in
__inet_del_ifa(), as a result, the secondary address(0.0.0.4/0 scope 0x40)
is lost. The memory of the secondary address is leaked and the reference of
in_device and net_device is leaked.

Fix this problem:
Look for 'last_prim' starting at location of the deleted IP and inserting
the promoted IP into the location of 'last_prim'.

Fixes: 0ff60a45678e ("[IPV4]: Fix secondary IP addresses after promotion")
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
---
v1->v2: Change the implementation to Julian's.
	The commit message is modified.
 net/ipv4/devinet.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
index 9cf64ee47dd2..ca0ff15dc8fa 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
@@ -355,14 +355,14 @@ static void __inet_del_ifa(struct in_device *in_dev,
 {
 	struct in_ifaddr *promote = NULL;
 	struct in_ifaddr *ifa, *ifa1;
-	struct in_ifaddr *last_prim;
+	struct in_ifaddr __rcu **last_prim;
 	struct in_ifaddr *prev_prom = NULL;
 	int do_promote = IN_DEV_PROMOTE_SECONDARIES(in_dev);
 
 	ASSERT_RTNL();
 
 	ifa1 = rtnl_dereference(*ifap);
-	last_prim = rtnl_dereference(in_dev->ifa_list);
+	last_prim = ifap;
 	if (in_dev->dead)
 		goto no_promotions;
 
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static void __inet_del_ifa(struct in_device *in_dev,
 		while ((ifa = rtnl_dereference(*ifap1)) != NULL) {
 			if (!(ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY) &&
 			    ifa1->ifa_scope <= ifa->ifa_scope)
-				last_prim = ifa;
+				last_prim = &ifa->ifa_next;
 
 			if (!(ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY) ||
 			    ifa1->ifa_mask != ifa->ifa_mask ||
@@ -440,9 +440,9 @@ static void __inet_del_ifa(struct in_device *in_dev,
 
 			rcu_assign_pointer(prev_prom->ifa_next, next_sec);
 
-			last_sec = rtnl_dereference(last_prim->ifa_next);
+			last_sec = rtnl_dereference(*last_prim);
 			rcu_assign_pointer(promote->ifa_next, last_sec);
-			rcu_assign_pointer(last_prim->ifa_next, promote);
+			rcu_assign_pointer(*last_prim, promote);
 		}
 
 		promote->ifa_flags &= ~IFA_F_SECONDARY;
-- 
2.34.1