[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230906160729.3cf829c0@hermes.local>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 16:07:29 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, Soheil
Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 4/4] tcp: defer regular ACK while processing
socket backlog
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 13:31:17 -0700
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
>
> Looks great. Any reason any workload may want to switch this feature
> off? I can't think of one...
Never underestimate the likelihood that some TCP stack or middlebox
is broken and needs more ACK's to work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists