[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b5dd10a-2728-c75b-6c4d-b03cebcaecfe@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 15:45:15 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>, Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
Cc: john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/7] add BPF_F_PERMANENT flag for sockmap
skmsg redirect
On 9/8/23 2:29 PM, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 06:07 PM +08, Liu Jian wrote:
>> v3->v4: Change the two helpers's description.
>> Let BPF_F_PERMANENT takes precedence over apply/cork_bytes.
>
> Sorry, will need some more time to review this.
>
> I wanted to test it and noticed we have a regression in sockamp in
> bpf-next @ 831c4b3f39c7:
All fixed in bpf, for testing pls use this tree until we have it over in bpf-next.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists