[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230911170531.828100-2-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:05:28 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/4] tcp: no longer release socket ownership in tcp_release_cb()
This partially reverts c3f9b01849ef ("tcp: tcp_release_cb()
should release socket ownership").
prequeue has been removed by Florian in commit e7942d0633c4
("tcp: remove prequeue support")
__tcp_checksum_complete_user() being gone, we no longer
have to release socket ownership in tcp_release_cb().
This is a prereq for third patch in the series
("net: call prot->release_cb() when processing backlog").
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/core/sock.c | 3 ---
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 10 ----------
2 files changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 16584e2dd6481a3fc28d796db785439f0446703b..21610e3845a5042f7c648ccb3e0d90126df20a0b 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -3519,9 +3519,6 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk)
if (sk->sk_backlog.tail)
__release_sock(sk);
- /* Warning : release_cb() might need to release sk ownership,
- * ie call sock_release_ownership(sk) before us.
- */
if (sk->sk_prot->release_cb)
sk->sk_prot->release_cb(sk);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index ccfc8bbf745586cd23dcf02d755d6981dc92742e..b4cac12d0e6348aaa3a3957b0091ea7fe6553731 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -1101,16 +1101,6 @@ void tcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
tcp_tsq_write(sk);
__sock_put(sk);
}
- /* Here begins the tricky part :
- * We are called from release_sock() with :
- * 1) BH disabled
- * 2) sk_lock.slock spinlock held
- * 3) socket owned by us (sk->sk_lock.owned == 1)
- *
- * But following code is meant to be called from BH handlers,
- * so we should keep BH disabled, but early release socket ownership
- */
- sock_release_ownership(sk);
if (flags & TCPF_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED) {
tcp_write_timer_handler(sk);
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists