netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 4/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory leaks in test_vcap_xn_rule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <253e481e308f73cf9ae3b55b62bc00412047c02b.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:41:15 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, lars.povlsen@...rochip.com, 
 Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com, daniel.machon@...rochip.com,
 davem@...emloft.net,  edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,  netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 4/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix possible memory
 leaks in test_vcap_xn_rule_creator()

On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 16:02 +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, the duprule which
> is allocated by kzalloc in vcap_dup_rule(), 

Small typo above, I think it should be 'vcap_alloc_rule' instead of
'vcap_dup_rule'. I think it's relevant, otherwise looking only at the
changelog, the next patch would be a not-needed/duplicated of this one.

Please fix the above, thanks!

Paolo