[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230913135348.GT401982@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:53:48 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, nbd@....name,
john@...ozen.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: mtk_wed: check
update_wo_rx_stats in mtk_wed_update_rx_stats()
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 01:47:49PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:28:00AM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > Check if update_wo_rx_stats function pointer is properly set in
> > > mtk_wed_update_rx_stats routine before accessing it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> >
> > Hi Lorenzo,
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> >
> > I'm a little curious about this.
> >
> > Is there a condition where it is not set but accessed,
> > which would presumably be a bug that warrants a fixes tag and
> > targeting at 'net'?
> >
> > Or can it not occur, in which case this check is perhaps not needed?
>
> nope, so far Wireless Ethernet Dispatches (WED) is supported just by mt7915
> that sets update_wo_rx_stats callback. Howerver, I am currently working on WED
> support for mt7996 where we do not have this callback available at the moment.
Thanks Lorenzo,
Understood. In that case the patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists