netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] Add support for OPEN Alliance 10BASE-T1x MACPHY Serial Interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 17:45:54 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
 Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
 Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
 Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, horms@...nel.org,
 casper.casan@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] Add support for OPEN Alliance 10BASE-T1x
 MACPHY Serial Interface

On 13/09/2023 15:26, Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 10/09/23 4:25 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On 08/09/2023 16:29, Parthiban Veerasooran wrote:
>>> This patch series contain the below updates,
>>> - Adds support for OPEN Alliance 10BASE-T1x MACPHY Serial Interface in the
>>>    net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c.
>>> - Adds driver support for Microchip LAN8650/1 Rev.B0 10BASE-T1S MACPHY
>>>    Ethernet driver in the net/ethernet/microchip/lan865x.c.
>>
>> And why is this RFC? Do you mean by that it is buggy and not finished,
>> so we should not review?
> 
> No, this is not a buggy/unfinished patch series. I have added RFC as 

I don't understand how people name their stuff RFC. Some send totally
buggy and untested bindings under RFC and, after receiving feedback,
respond surprised - it was just RFC!

Other send RFC and expect review.

Just call it a PATCH. PATCH is Requesting for Comments.

Best regards,
Krzysztof