[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d53ca8d-bcf6-4673-a8ff-b621d700576e@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:16:53 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, steen.hegelund@...rochip.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
horms@...nel.org, casper.casan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com,
Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] net: ethernet: implement OPEN Alliance
control transaction interface
> +struct oa_tc6 {
> + struct spi_device *spi;
> + bool ctrl_prot;
> +};
Should this be considered an opaque structure which the MAC driver
should not access the members?
I don't see anything setting ctrl_prot here. Does it need a setter and
a getter?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists