netdev - Re: linux-next: boot warning from the bpf-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:19:12 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Alexei Starovoitov
 <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf
 <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, Linux
 Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: boot warning from the bpf-next tree

Hi Hou,

On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:56:04 +0800 Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. The warning is due to the checking added in commit c93047255202
> ("bpf: Ensure unit_size is matched with slab cache object size").
> Considering that bpf-next has not merged the patch-set yet, should I
> post a patch to bpf tree to fix it ? A fix patch is attached which can
> fix the warning in my local setup.

I will apply your patch as a merge resolution for the bpf-next tree
merge until something better is done.   Please make sure to let me know
if it is not longer needed (in case it is not obvious).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped