[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eceeb36a-6621-b0c3-371d-e617023fb0e4@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 18:12:23 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
CC: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<andrii@...nel.org>, <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <song@...nel.org>, <yhs@...com>,
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>, <sdf@...gle.com>,
<haoluo@...gle.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, Anatoly Burakov
<anatoly.burakov@...el.com>, Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>, Maryam Tahhan
<mtahhan@...hat.com>, <xdp-hints@...-project.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next 01/23] ice: make RX hash reading code
more reusable
From: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 21:26:40 +0200
> Previously, we only needed RX hash in skb path,
> hence all related code was written with skb in mind.
> But with the addition of XDP hints via kfuncs to the ice driver,
> the same logic will be needed in .xmo_() callbacks.
>
> Separate generic process of reading RX hash from a descriptor
> into a separate function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
I like the patch, except three minors above,
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c | 37 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c
> index c8322fb6f2b3..8f7f6d78f7bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c
> @@ -63,28 +63,43 @@ static enum pkt_hash_types ice_ptype_to_htype(u16 ptype)
> }
>
> /**
> - * ice_rx_hash - set the hash value in the skb
> + * ice_get_rx_hash - get RX hash value from descriptor
> + * @rx_desc: specific descriptor
> + *
> + * Returns hash, if present, 0 otherwise.
> + */
> +static u32
> +ice_get_rx_hash(const union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *rx_desc)
The whole declaration could easily fit into one line :>
> +{
> + const struct ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_nic *nic_mdid;
> +
> + if (rx_desc->wb.rxdid != ICE_RXDID_FLEX_NIC)
Not really related: have you tried to measure branch hit/miss here?
Can't it be a candidate for unlikely()?
> + return 0;
> +
> + nic_mdid = (struct ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_nic *)rx_desc;
> + return le32_to_cpu(nic_mdid->rss_hash);
I think the common convention in the kernel is to separate the last
return from the main body with a newline.
To not leave the cast above alone, you can embed it into the declaration.
const struct ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_nic *mdid = (typeof(mdid))rx_desc;
This is a compile-time cast w/o any maths anyway, so doing it before
checking for the descriptor type doesn't hurt in any way.
if (!= FLEX)
return 0;
return le32_ ...
(or via a ternary)
> +}
[...]
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists