[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87028f85-bdc7-0ce6-ed4c-cfc6b8322fe4@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 11:21:34 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: chenhao418@...wei.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>, lanhao@...wei.com,
liuyonglong@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, shenjian15@...wei.com,
wangjie125@...wei.com, wangpeiyang1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: phy: always call
phy_process_state_change() under lock
On 9/14/23 08:35, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> phy_stop() calls phy_process_state_change() while holding the phydev
> lock, so also arrange for phy_state_machine() to do the same, so that
> this function is called with consistent locking.
>
> Tested-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists