netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: stmmac: add platform library

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230914112406.GA401982@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 13:24:06 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: stmmac: add platform library

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:20:55PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 04:52:27PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:29:11PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > +	default:
> > > +		return -ENOTSUPP;
> > 
> > Checkpatch seems to think that EOPNOTSUPP would be more appropriate
> > as "ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code".
> 
> It needs to be an error code that clk_set_rate() below isn't going to
> return - because if clk_set_rate() does return it, then the users are
> going to end up issuing an incorrect error message to the user. I
> suspect clk_set_rate() could quite legitimately return -EOPNOTSUPP
> or -EINVAL.
> 
> Sadly, the CCF implementation of clk_set_rate() doesn't detail what
> errors it could return, but it looks like -EBUSY, -EINVAL, or something
> from pm_runtime_resume_and_get().

Thanks Russell,

Understood.

In that case perhaps ENOTSUPP is not such a bad choice as:
a) it seems rather unlikely CCF would use it; and
b) the scope of usage is well contained - the helper and any direct callers.

No further objections from my side :)

> 
> Interestingly, while looking at this, pm_runtime_resume_and_get() can
> return '1' if e.g. rpm is disabled and the device is active. It looks
> to me like CCF treats that as an error in multiple locations.

The plot thickens...