[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQQrmiLREiNYtakK@Laptop-X1>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 18:02:02 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
Thomas Haller <thaller@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: do not merge differe type and protocol
routes
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 09:08:18PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 9/14/23 8:23 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:36:51AM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> >>> I do agree now that protocol is informative (passthrough from the kernel
> >>> perspective) so not really part of the route. That should be dropped
> >
> > I'm not sure. Is there any user space route daemon will use this info? e.g. some
> > BGP route daemon?
>
> It is passthrough information for userspace to track who installed the
> route. It is not part of the route itself, but metadata passed in and
> returned.
Thanks. I will drop this info.
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists