[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJyktWcztc76Pw16MP-k-DfSjstW+WFgRxwUat7p25CGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 14:55:08 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@....com>
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: drr: dont intepret cls results when asked to drop
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:42 PM Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@....com> wrote:
>
> If asked to drop a packet via TC_ACT_SHOT it is unsafe to
> assume res.class contains a valid pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@....com>
> ---
> net/sched/sch_drr.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_drr.c b/net/sched/sch_drr.c
> index 19901e77cd3b..2b854cb6edf9 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_drr.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_drr.c
> @@ -309,6 +309,8 @@ static struct drr_class *drr_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch,
> *qerr = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS | __NET_XMIT_BYPASS;
> fl = rcu_dereference_bh(q->filter_list);
> result = tcf_classify(skb, NULL, fl, &res, false);
> + if (result == TC_ACT_SHOT)
> + return NULL;
> if (result >= 0) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> switch (result) {
> --
> 2.37.2
>
I do not see a bug, TC_ACT_SHOT is handled in the switch (result) just fine
at line 320 ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists