[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQUjD0liUnH+ykKY@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:37:51 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, kadlec@...filter.org,
fw@...len.de, gfs2@...ts.linux.dev,
David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>, tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: nft_rhash_walk, rhashtable and resize event
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:05:06AM -0400, Alexander Aring wrote:
>
> My question is here? Is that allowed to do because a resize event may
> change the order how to iterate over a rhashtable.
Walking over an rhashtable should be a last resort. There is
no guarantee of stability.
If you skip entries after a resize then you may miss entries.
If you want a stable walk, allocate an extra 8 bytes and use
a linked list.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists