[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<169496942446.18728.7629668615433862698.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:50:24 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
avkrasnov@...utedevices.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
oxffffaa@...il.com, bobby.eshleman@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] vsock/test: add recv_buf()/send_buf() utility
functions and some improvements
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 14:14:47 +0200 you wrote:
> We recently found that some tests were failing [1].
>
> The problem was that we were not waiting for all the bytes correctly,
> so we had a partial read. I had initially suggested using MSG_WAITALL,
> but this could have timeout problems.
>
> Since we already had send_byte() and recv_byte() that handled the timeout,
> but also the expected return value, I moved that code to two new functions
> that we can now use to send/receive generic buffers.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,1/5] vsock/test: add recv_buf() utility function
(no matching commit)
- [net-next,2/5] vsock/test: use recv_buf() in vsock_test.c
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a0bcb8357716
- [net-next,3/5] vsock/test: add send_buf() utility function
(no matching commit)
- [net-next,4/5] vsock/test: use send_buf() in vsock_test.c
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2a8548a9bb4c
- [net-next,5/5] vsock/test: track bytes in MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/bc7bea452d32
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists