[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230918093240.29824-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:32:38 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: dpll: Fix code blocks
kernel test robot and Stephen Rothwell report htmldocs warnings:
Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:427: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 18 supplied.
.. code-block:: c
<snipped>...
Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:444: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 21 supplied.
.. code-block:: c
<snipped>...
Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:474: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 12 supplied.
.. code-block:: c
<snipped>...
Fix these above by adding missing blank line separator after code-block
directive.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309180456.lOhxy9gS-lkp@intel.com/
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20230918131521.155e9e63@canb.auug.org.au/
Fixes: dbb291f19393b6 ("dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface")
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
---
Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
index bb52f1b8c0be31..01eb4de867036f 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
@@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ The simplest implementation is in the OCP TimeCard driver. The ops
structures are defined like this:
.. code-block:: c
+
static const struct dpll_device_ops dpll_ops = {
.lock_status_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_lock_status_get,
.mode_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_mode_get,
@@ -442,6 +443,7 @@ structures are defined like this:
The registration part is then looks like this part:
.. code-block:: c
+
clkid = pci_get_dsn(pdev);
bp->dpll = dpll_device_get(clkid, 0, THIS_MODULE);
if (IS_ERR(bp->dpll)) {
@@ -472,6 +474,7 @@ The registration part is then looks like this part:
In the error path we have to rewind every allocation in the reverse order:
.. code-block:: c
+
while (i) {
--i;
dpll_pin_unregister(bp->dpll, bp->sma[i].dpll_pin, &dpll_pins_ops, &bp->sma[i]);
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists