netdev - Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2023-09-16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQL14y5=eXp=KwAjOYeLuu8DTbL_GDkGxNoHjhy498yBqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 06:40:57 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2023-09-16

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 6:25 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 6:59 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi David, hi Jakub, hi Paolo, hi Eric,
> >
> > The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
> >
> > We've added 73 non-merge commits during the last 9 day(s) which contain
> > a total of 79 files changed, 5275 insertions(+), 600 deletions(-).
> >
> > The main changes are:
> >
> > 1) Basic BTF validation in libbpf, from Andrii Nakryiko.
> >
> > 2) bpf_assert(), bpf_throw(), exceptions in bpf progs, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.
> >
> > 3) next_thread cleanups, from Oleg Nesterov.
> >
> > 4) Add mcpu=v4 support to arm32, from Puranjay Mohan.
> >
> > 5) Add support for __percpu pointers in bpf progs, from Yonghong Song.
> >
> > 6) Fix bpf tailcall interaction with bpf trampoline, from Leon Hwang.
> >
> > 7) Raise irq_work in bpf_mem_alloc while irqs are disabled to improve refill probabablity, from Hou Tao.
> >
> > Please consider pulling these changes from:
> >
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git
> >
>
> This might have been raised already, but bpf on x86 now depends on
> CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC ?
>
> $ grep CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC .config
> # CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC is not set
>
> $ make ...
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:3022:58: error: no member named 'sp' in
> 'struct unwind_state'
>                 if (!addr || !consume_fn(cookie, (u64)addr,
> (u64)state.sp, (u64)state.bp))
>                                                                  ~~~~~ ^
> 1 error generated.

Kumar,
can probably explain better,
but no the bpf as whole doesn't depend.
One feature needs either ORC or frame unwinder.
It won't work with unwinder_guess.
The build error is a separate issue.
It hasn't been reported before.