[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJmdkyn8_hU4esycRG-XvPa_Djsp6PyaOX5cYP1Obdr4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 09:54:36 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nic_swsd@...ltek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
bjorn@...k.no, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next resend 1/2] r8152: remove queuing rx packets in driver
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:42 AM Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> wrote:
>
> The original way would process all rx and queue the rx packets in the
> driver. Now, the process would be broken if the budget is exhausted. And
> the remained list would be queue back to rx_done for next schedule.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
This deserves a Fixes: tag
> ---
> drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 52 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> index 0c13d9950cd8..ae46e7e46e39 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ struct r8152 {
> struct tx_agg tx_info[RTL8152_MAX_TX];
> struct list_head rx_info, rx_used;
> struct list_head rx_done, tx_free;
> - struct sk_buff_head tx_queue, rx_queue;
> + struct sk_buff_head tx_queue;
> spinlock_t rx_lock, tx_lock;
> struct delayed_work schedule, hw_phy_work;
> struct mii_if_info mii;
> @@ -2031,7 +2031,6 @@ static int alloc_all_mem(struct r8152 *tp)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tp->tx_free);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tp->rx_done);
> skb_queue_head_init(&tp->tx_queue);
> - skb_queue_head_init(&tp->rx_queue);
> atomic_set(&tp->rx_count, 0);
>
> for (i = 0; i < RTL8152_MAX_RX; i++) {
> @@ -2431,24 +2430,6 @@ static int rx_bottom(struct r8152 *tp, int budget)
> int ret = 0, work_done = 0;
> struct napi_struct *napi = &tp->napi;
>
> - if (!skb_queue_empty(&tp->rx_queue)) {
> - while (work_done < budget) {
> - struct sk_buff *skb = __skb_dequeue(&tp->rx_queue);
> - struct net_device *netdev = tp->netdev;
> - struct net_device_stats *stats = &netdev->stats;
> - unsigned int pkt_len;
> -
> - if (!skb)
> - break;
> -
> - pkt_len = skb->len;
> - napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
> - work_done++;
> - stats->rx_packets++;
> - stats->rx_bytes += pkt_len;
> - }
> - }
> -
> if (list_empty(&tp->rx_done))
> goto out1;
>
> @@ -2484,10 +2465,6 @@ static int rx_bottom(struct r8152 *tp, int budget)
> unsigned int pkt_len, rx_frag_head_sz;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
>
> - /* limit the skb numbers for rx_queue */
> - if (unlikely(skb_queue_len(&tp->rx_queue) >= 1000))
> - break;
> -
> pkt_len = le32_to_cpu(rx_desc->opts1) & RX_LEN_MASK;
> if (pkt_len < ETH_ZLEN)
> break;
> @@ -2525,14 +2502,10 @@ static int rx_bottom(struct r8152 *tp, int budget)
>
> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, netdev);
> rtl_rx_vlan_tag(rx_desc, skb);
> - if (work_done < budget) {
> - work_done++;
> - stats->rx_packets++;
> - stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
> - napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
> - } else {
> - __skb_queue_tail(&tp->rx_queue, skb);
> - }
> + work_done++;
> + stats->rx_packets++;
> + stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
> + napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
>
> find_next_rx:
> rx_data = rx_agg_align(rx_data + pkt_len + ETH_FCS_LEN);
> @@ -2562,16 +2535,24 @@ static int rx_bottom(struct r8152 *tp, int budget)
> urb->actual_length = 0;
> list_add_tail(&agg->list, next);
> }
> +
> + /* Break if budget is exhausted. */
[1] More conventional way to to put this condition at the beginning of
the while () loop,
because the budget could be zero.
> + if (work_done >= budget)
> + break;
> }
>
> + /* Splice the remained list back to rx_done */
> if (!list_empty(&rx_queue)) {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&tp->rx_lock, flags);
> - list_splice_tail(&rx_queue, &tp->rx_done);
> + list_splice(&rx_queue, &tp->rx_done);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tp->rx_lock, flags);
> }
>
> out1:
> - return work_done;
> + if (work_done > budget)
This (work_done >budget) condition would never be true if point [1] is
addressed.
> + return budget;
> + else
> + return work_done;
> }
>
> static void tx_bottom(struct r8152 *tp)
> @@ -2992,9 +2973,6 @@ static int rtl_stop_rx(struct r8152 *tp)
> list_splice(&tmp_list, &tp->rx_info);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tp->rx_lock, flags);
>
> - while (!skb_queue_empty(&tp->rx_queue))
> - dev_kfree_skb(__skb_dequeue(&tp->rx_queue));
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists