[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6509acb026cd0_1dda19294c@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 10:14:08 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dborkman@...nel.org,
Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 2/3] net: prevent rewrite of msg_name in
sock_sendmsg()
Jordan Rife wrote:
> Callers of sock_sendmsg(), and similarly kernel_sendmsg(), in kernel
> space may observe their value of msg_name change in cases where BPF
> sendmsg hooks rewrite the send address. This has been confirmed to break
> NFS mounts running in UDP mode and has the potential to break other
> systems.
>
> This patch:
>
> 1) Creates a new function called __sock_sendmsg() with same logic as the
> old sock_sendmsg() function.
> 2) Replaces calls to sock_sendmsg() made by __sys_sendto() and
> __sys_sendmsg() with __sock_sendmsg() to avoid an unnecessary copy,
> as these system calls are already protected.
> 3) Modifies sock_sendmsg() so that it makes a copy of msg_name if
> present before passing it down the stack to insulate callers from
> changes to the send address.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230912013332.2048422-1-jrife@google.com/
> Fixes: 1cedee13d25a ("bpf: Hooks for sys_sendmsg")
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>
> ---
> v2->v3: Add "Fixes" tag.
> v1->v2: Split up original patch into patch series. Perform address copy
> in sock_sendmsg() instead of sock->ops->sendmsg().
>
> net/socket.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index eb7f14143caed..2d34a69b84406 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -737,6 +737,14 @@ static inline int sock_sendmsg_nosec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int __sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg)
> +{
> + int err = security_socket_sendmsg(sock, msg,
> + msg_data_left(msg));
> +
> + return err ?: sock_sendmsg_nosec(sock, msg);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * sock_sendmsg - send a message through @sock
> * @sock: socket
> @@ -747,10 +755,22 @@ static inline int sock_sendmsg_nosec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg)
> */
> int sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg)
> {
> - int err = security_socket_sendmsg(sock, msg,
> - msg_data_left(msg));
> + struct sockaddr_storage address;
> + struct sockaddr_storage *save_addr = (struct sockaddr_storage *)msg->msg_name;
Since there's feedback on patch 3/3: please maintain reverse xmas tree:
reorder these two declarations from longest to shortest.
> + int ret;
>
> - return err ?: sock_sendmsg_nosec(sock, msg);
> + if (msg->msg_name) {
> + if (msg->msg_namelen < 0 || msg->msg_namelen > sizeof(address))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + memcpy(&address, msg->msg_name, msg->msg_namelen);
> + msg->msg_name = &address;
> + }
> +
> + ret = __sock_sendmsg(sock, msg);
> + msg->msg_name = save_addr;
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_sendmsg);
>
> @@ -1138,7 +1158,7 @@ static ssize_t sock_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> if (sock->type == SOCK_SEQPACKET)
> msg.msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
>
> - res = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> + res = __sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> *from = msg.msg_iter;
> return res;
> }
> @@ -2174,7 +2194,7 @@ int __sys_sendto(int fd, void __user *buff, size_t len, unsigned int flags,
> if (sock->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
> msg.msg_flags = flags;
> - err = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> + err = __sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
>
> out_put:
> fput_light(sock->file, fput_needed);
> @@ -2538,7 +2558,7 @@ static int ____sys_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg_sys,
> err = sock_sendmsg_nosec(sock, msg_sys);
> goto out_freectl;
> }
> - err = sock_sendmsg(sock, msg_sys);
> + err = __sock_sendmsg(sock, msg_sys);
> /*
> * If this is sendmmsg() and sending to current destination address was
> * successful, remember it.
> --
> 2.42.0.459.ge4e396fd5e-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists