[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5b25ee07245125fac4bbdc3b3604758251907d2.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 15:19:54 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, Arseniy Krasnov
<avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Bobby Eshleman
<bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...rdevices.ru, oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/4] vsock/virtio/vhost: MSG_ZEROCOPY
preparations
On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 09:54 +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 07:56:00PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> > Hi Stefano,
> >
> > thanks for review! So when this patchset will be merged to net-next,
> > I'll start sending next part of MSG_ZEROCOPY patchset, e.g. AF_VSOCK +
> > Documentation/ patches.
>
> Ack, if it is not a very big series, maybe better to include also the
> tests so we can run them before merge the feature.
I understand that at least 2 follow-up series are waiting for this, one
of them targeting net-next and the bigger one targeting the virtio
tree. Am I correct?
DaveM suggests this should go via the virtio tree, too. Any different
opinion?
Thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists