netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] riscv, bpf: Unify 32-bit sign-extension to emit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230919035839.3297328-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:58:34 +0800
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
	Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
	Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>,
	Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] riscv, bpf: Unify 32-bit sign-extension to emit_sextw

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>

For code unification, add emit_sextw wrapper to unify all the 32-bit
sign-extension operations.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h        |  5 +++++
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
index d21c6c92a..03a6ecb43 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -1084,6 +1084,11 @@ static inline void emit_subw(u8 rd, u8 rs1, u8 rs2, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 		emit(rv_subw(rd, rs1, rs2), ctx);
 }
 
+static inline void emit_sextw(u8 rd, u8 rs, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
+{
+	emit_addiw(rd, rs, 0, ctx);
+}
+
 #endif /* __riscv_xlen == 64 */
 
 void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 8423f4ddf..8b654c0cf 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -413,8 +413,8 @@ static void emit_zext_32_rd_rs(u8 *rd, u8 *rs, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 
 static void emit_sext_32_rd_rs(u8 *rd, u8 *rs, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
-	emit_addiw(RV_REG_T2, *rd, 0, ctx);
-	emit_addiw(RV_REG_T1, *rs, 0, ctx);
+	emit_sextw(RV_REG_T2, *rd, ctx);
+	emit_sextw(RV_REG_T1, *rs, ctx);
 	*rd = RV_REG_T2;
 	*rs = RV_REG_T1;
 }
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void emit_zext_32_rd_t1(u8 *rd, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 
 static void emit_sext_32_rd(u8 *rd, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
-	emit_addiw(RV_REG_T2, *rd, 0, ctx);
+	emit_sextw(RV_REG_T2, *rd, ctx);
 	*rd = RV_REG_T2;
 }
 
@@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 			emit_srai(rd, RV_REG_T1, 64 - insn->off, ctx);
 			break;
 		case 32:
-			emit_addiw(rd, rs, 0, ctx);
+			emit_sextw(rd, rs, ctx);
 			break;
 		}
 		if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
@@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
 		 * as t1 is used only in comparison against zero.
 		 */
 		if (!is64 && imm < 0)
-			emit_addiw(RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_T1, 0, ctx);
+			emit_sextw(RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
 		e = ctx->ninsns;
 		rvoff -= ninsns_rvoff(e - s);
 		emit_branch(BPF_JNE, RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, ctx);
-- 
2.25.1