netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/4] vsock/virtio/vhost: MSG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:06:48 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Stefano Garzarella
	 <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi
 <stefanha@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jason Wang
 <jasowang@...hat.com>, Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>, 
 kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel@...rdevices.ru,  oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/4] vsock/virtio/vhost: MSG_ZEROCOPY
 preparations

On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 22:38 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 03:35:51PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 03:19:54PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > 
> > > DaveM suggests this should go via the virtio tree, too. Any different
> > > opinion?
> > 
> > For this series should be fine, I'm not sure about the next series.
> > Merging this with the virtio tree, then it forces us to do it for
> > followup as well right?
> > 
> > In theory followup is more on the core, so better with net-next, but
> > it's also true that for now only virtio transports support it, so it
> > might be okay to continue with virtio.
> > 
> > @Michael WDYT?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Stefano
> 
> I didn't get DaveM's mail - was this off-list?

Yes, that was off-list co-ordination.

> I think net-next is easier because the follow up belongs in net-next.
> But if not I can take it, sure. Let me know.

Since there is agreement on that route, we will take it (likely
tomorrow).

Cheers,

Paolo