netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] net: ethernet: implement OPEN Alliance control transaction interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <03cfa7c9-53a3-9107-c185-7e5953475518@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 09:15:28 +0000
From: <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>
To: <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <corbet@....net>,
	<Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <horms@...nel.org>,
	<casper.casan@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
	<Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com>,
	<Ciprian.Regus@...log.com>, <jtm@...ingdog.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] net: ethernet: implement OPEN Alliance
 control transaction interface

Hi Andrew,

On 20/09/23 7:07 pm, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
>> Ah ok, I think there is a misunderstanding here. This is related to OPEN
>> Alliance protocol. Control transactions consist of one or more control
>> commands. Control commands are used by the SPI host to read and write
>> registers within the MAC-PHY. Each control commands are composed of a
>> 32-bit control command header followed by register data. WNR (write not
>> read) bit in the control command header indicates if data is to be
>> written to registers (when set) or read from registers (when clear). so
>> basically it indicates the type of the control command on the registers.
> 
> OK, so this clearly indicates the names are bad and documentation is
> missing if i got this completely wrong. Adding kerneldoc to these
> functions should help.
Sure, I will do that.
> 
>          Andrew
> 
>