netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: platform: fix the incorrect parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <873f07e6-cc99-1901-4d09-db77994d88db@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:25:16 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	<joabreu@...opsys.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	<bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: platform: fix the incorrect parameter



On 9/20/2023 11:24 PM, Clark Wang wrote:
> The second parameter of stmmac_pltfr_init() needs the pointer of
> "struct plat_stmmacenet_data". So, correct the parameter typo when calling the
> function.
> 
> Otherwise, it may cause this alignment exception when doing suspend/resume.
> [   49.067201] CPU1 is up
> [   49.135258] Internal error: SP/PC alignment exception: 000000008a000000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [   49.143346] Modules linked in: soc_imx9 crct10dif_ce polyval_ce nvmem_imx_ocotp_fsb_s400 polyval_generic layerscape_edac_mod snd_soc_fsl_asoc_card snd_soc_imx_audmux snd_soc_imx_card snd_soc_wm8962 el_enclave snd_soc_fsl_micfil rtc_pcf2127 rtc_pcf2131 flexcan can_dev snd_soc_fsl_xcvr snd_soc_fsl_sai imx8_media_dev(C) snd_soc_fsl_utils fuse
> [   49.173393] CPU: 0 PID: 565 Comm: sh Tainted: G         C         6.5.0-rc4-next-20230804-05047-g5781a6249dae #677
> [   49.183721] Hardware name: NXP i.MX93 11X11 EVK board (DT)
> [   49.189190] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [   49.196140] pc : 0x80800052
> [   49.198931] lr : stmmac_pltfr_resume+0x34/0x50
> [   49.203368] sp : ffff800082f8bab0
> [   49.206670] x29: ffff800082f8bab0 x28: ffff0000047d0ec0 x27: ffff80008186c170
> [   49.213794] x26: 0000000b5e4ff1ba x25: ffff800081e5fa74 x24: 0000000000000010
> [   49.220918] x23: ffff800081fe0000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000000
> [   49.228042] x20: ffff0000001b4010 x19: ffff0000001b4010 x18: 0000000000000006
> [   49.235166] x17: ffff7ffffe007000 x16: ffff800080000000 x15: 0000000000000000
> [   49.242290] x14: 00000000000000fc x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
> [   49.249414] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000a60 x9 : ffff800082f8b8c0
> [   49.256538] x8 : 0000000000000008 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 000000005f54a200
> [   49.263662] x5 : 0000000001000000 x4 : ffff800081b93680 x3 : ffff800081519be0
> [   49.270786] x2 : 0000000080800052 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0000001b4000
> [   49.277911] Call trace:
> [   49.280346]  0x80800052
> [   49.282781]  platform_pm_resume+0x2c/0x68
> [   49.286785]  dpm_run_callback.constprop.0+0x74/0x134
> [   49.291742]  device_resume+0x88/0x194
> [   49.295391]  dpm_resume+0x10c/0x230
> [   49.298866]  dpm_resume_end+0x18/0x30
> [   49.302515]  suspend_devices_and_enter+0x2b8/0x624
> [   49.307299]  pm_suspend+0x1fc/0x348
> [   49.310774]  state_store+0x80/0x104
> [   49.314258]  kobj_attr_store+0x18/0x2c
> [   49.318002]  sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54
> [   49.321659]  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x120/0x1ec
> [   49.326088]  vfs_write+0x1bc/0x300
> [   49.329485]  ksys_write+0x70/0x104
> [   49.332874]  __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28
> [   49.336783]  invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114
> [   49.340527]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xe4
> [   49.345224]  do_el0_svc+0x38/0x98
> [   49.348526]  el0_svc+0x2c/0x84
> [   49.351568]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c
> [   49.355910]  el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
> [   49.359567] Code: ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? (????????)
> [   49.365644] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> 
> Fixes: 97117eb51ec8 ("net: stmmac: platform: provide stmmac_pltfr_init()")
> Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
> --->  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> index 0d9b2138b60a..3c6fd9027934 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> @@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused stmmac_pltfr_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = stmmac_pltfr_init(pdev, priv->plat->bsp_priv);
> +	ret = stmmac_pltfr_init(pdev, priv->plat);
>  	if (ret)

And this compiled because priv->plat->bsp_priv is a void pointer.

Makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>

>  		return ret;
>