netdev - [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: lockless implementation of SO_BUSY_POLL, SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, SO_BUSY_POLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230921202818.2356959-5-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 20:28:14 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: lockless implementation of SO_BUSY_POLL,
 SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, SO_BUSY_POLL_BUDGET

Setting sk->sk_ll_usec, sk_prefer_busy_poll and sk_busy_poll_budget
do not require the socket lock, readers are lockless anyway.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
 net/core/sock.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 4d20b74a93cb57bba58447f37e87b677167b8425..408081549bd777811058d5de3e9df0f459e6e999 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1140,6 +1140,26 @@ int sk_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 	case SO_DOMAIN:
 	case SO_ERROR:
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
+	case SO_BUSY_POLL:
+		if (val < 0)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_ll_usec, val);
+		return 0;
+	case SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL:
+		if (valbool && !sockopt_capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+			return -EPERM;
+		WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prefer_busy_poll, valbool);
+		return 0;
+	case SO_BUSY_POLL_BUDGET:
+		if (val > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_busy_poll_budget) &&
+		    !sockopt_capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+			return -EPERM;
+		if (val < 0 || val > U16_MAX)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_busy_poll_budget, val);
+		return 0;
+#endif
 	}
 
 	sockopt_lock_sock(sk);
@@ -1402,30 +1422,6 @@ int sk_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 		sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_SELECT_ERR_QUEUE, valbool);
 		break;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
-	case SO_BUSY_POLL:
-		if (val < 0)
-			ret = -EINVAL;
-		else
-			WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_ll_usec, val);
-		break;
-	case SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL:
-		if (valbool && !sockopt_capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
-			ret = -EPERM;
-		else
-			WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prefer_busy_poll, valbool);
-		break;
-	case SO_BUSY_POLL_BUDGET:
-		if (val > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_busy_poll_budget) && !sockopt_capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
-			ret = -EPERM;
-		} else {
-			if (val < 0 || val > U16_MAX)
-				ret = -EINVAL;
-			else
-				WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_busy_poll_budget, val);
-		}
-		break;
-#endif
 
 	case SO_MAX_PACING_RATE:
 		{
-- 
2.42.0.515.g380fc7ccd1-goog