[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b73ad3d-cfda-bce5-2589-e8674a58c827@csgroup.eu>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:16:52 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew
Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Björn Töpel
<bjorn@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>, Heiko
Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Huacai Chen
<chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, Luis
Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Michael
Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, "Naveen N.
Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>, Rick Edgecombe
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Steven
Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Thomas Bogendoerfer
<tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Will
Deacon <will@...nel.org>, "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>, "x86@...nel.org"
<x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] mm/execmem: introduce execmem_data_alloc()
Le 22/09/2023 à 00:52, Song Liu a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 12:31 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
> [...]
>> diff --git a/include/linux/execmem.h b/include/linux/execmem.h
>> index 519bdfdca595..09d45ac786e9 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/execmem.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/execmem.h
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>> * @EXECMEM_KPROBES: parameters for kprobes
>> * @EXECMEM_FTRACE: parameters for ftrace
>> * @EXECMEM_BPF: parameters for BPF
>> + * @EXECMEM_MODULE_DATA: parameters for module data sections
>> * @EXECMEM_TYPE_MAX:
>> */
>> enum execmem_type {
>> @@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ enum execmem_type {
>> EXECMEM_KPROBES,
>> EXECMEM_FTRACE,
>
> In longer term, I think we can improve the JITed code and merge
> kprobe/ftrace/bpf. to use the same ranges. Also, do we need special
> setting for FTRACE? If not, let's just remove it.
How can we do that ? Some platforms like powerpc require executable
memory for BPF and non-exec mem for KPROBE so it can't be in the same
area/ranges.
>
>> EXECMEM_BPF,
>> + EXECMEM_MODULE_DATA,
>> EXECMEM_TYPE_MAX,
>> };
>
> Overall, it is great that kprobe/ftrace/bpf no longer depend on modules.
>
> OTOH, I think we should merge execmem_type and existing mod_mem_type.
> Otherwise, we still need to handle page permissions in multiple places.
> What is our plan for that?
>
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists