| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230923162742.GO3303@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 19:27:42 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] powerpc: extend execmem_params for kprobes
allocations
Hi Christophe,
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:32:46AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Le 18/09/2023 à 09:29, Mike Rapoport a écrit :
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>
> >
> > powerpc overrides kprobes::alloc_insn_page() to remove writable
> > permissions when STRICT_MODULE_RWX is on.
> >
> > Add definition of EXECMEM_KRPOBES to execmem_params to allow using the
> > generic kprobes::alloc_insn_page() with the desired permissions.
> >
> > As powerpc uses breakpoint instructions to inject kprobes, it does not
> > need to constrain kprobe allocations to the modules area and can use the
> > entire vmalloc address space.
>
> I don't understand what you mean here. Does it mean kprobe allocation
> doesn't need to be executable ? I don't think so based on the pgprot you
> set.
>
> On powerpc book3s/32, vmalloc space is not executable. Only modules
> space is executable. X/NX cannot be set on a per page basis, it can only
> be set on a 256 Mbytes segment basis.
>
> See commit c49643319715 ("powerpc/32s: Only leave NX unset on segments
> used for modules") and 6ca055322da8 ("powerpc/32s: Use dedicated segment
> for modules with STRICT_KERNEL_RWX") and 7bee31ad8e2f ("powerpc/32s: Fix
> is_module_segment() when MODULES_VADDR is defined").
>
> So if your intention is still to have an executable kprobes, then you
> can't use vmalloc address space.
Right, and I've fixed the KPROBES range to uses the same range as MODULES.
The commit message is stale and I need to update it.
> Christophe
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 14 --------------
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> > index 62228c7072a2..14c5ddec3056 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> > @@ -126,20 +126,6 @@ kprobe_opcode_t *arch_adjust_kprobe_addr(unsigned long addr, unsigned long offse
> > return (kprobe_opcode_t *)(addr + offset);
> > }
> >
> > -void *alloc_insn_page(void)
> > -{
> > - void *page;
> > -
> > - page = execmem_text_alloc(EXECMEM_KPROBES, PAGE_SIZE);
> > - if (!page)
> > - return NULL;
> > -
> > - if (strict_module_rwx_enabled())
> > - set_memory_rox((unsigned long)page, 1);
> > -
> > - return page;
> > -}
> > -
> > int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > {
> > int ret = 0;
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c
> > index 824d9541a310..bf2c62aef628 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c
> > @@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ static struct execmem_params execmem_params __ro_after_init = {
> > [EXECMEM_DEFAULT] = {
> > .alignment = 1,
> > },
> > + [EXECMEM_KPROBES] = {
> > + .alignment = 1,
> > + },
> > [EXECMEM_MODULE_DATA] = {
> > .alignment = 1,
> > },
> > @@ -135,5 +138,13 @@ struct execmem_params __init *execmem_arch_params(void)
> >
> > range->pgprot = prot;
> >
> > + execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_KPROBES].start = VMALLOC_START;
> > + execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_KPROBES].start = VMALLOC_END;
> > +
> > + if (strict_module_rwx_enabled())
> > + execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_KPROBES].pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL_ROX;
> > + else
> > + execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_KPROBES].pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC;
> > +
> > return &execmem_params;
> > }
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists