netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] define and enforce phylink bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <228f24db-0a26-4d38-8f73-a9691262cc5f@arinc9.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 20:51:44 +0300
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean
 <olteanv@...il.com>, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
 Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
 Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>, Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
 Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
 Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
 Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>,
 Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Landen Chao
 <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>, DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
 Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
 Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
 Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
 Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
 John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
 Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, Lorenzo Bianconi
 <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
 Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
 Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
 Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
 Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
 Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
 erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] define and enforce phylink bindings

On 23.09.2023 18:12, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 09:28:41AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>> On 23.09.2023 01:36, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> You are missing:
>>>
>>> - The MAC has firmware driving the PHY, nothing for linux to do.
>>>
>>> There are properties in ethernet-controller.yaml the MAC driver would
>>> however like to use such as local-mac-address, max-frame-size,
>>> nvmem-cell-names etc.
>>
>> This is interesting. This is clearly a hardware difference of the ethernet
>> controller.
>>
>> I believe this fits case 1. There's still an MDIO bus the ethernet
>> controller uses, there's still a PHY on the MDIO bus which the ethernet
>> controller uses.
> 
> Why must there be an MDIO bus? All the bus provides is a communication
> channel to the PHY. There are PHYs which are memory mapped, or use
> I2C. SFP are a good example of I2C, which Linux maps to MDIO just to
> make things simple, but the hardware is I2C. Why must there be a PHY?
> Maybe it is a Base-K link, i.e. a baseboard link to a switch, or a BMC
> or something.

There's no requirement for an MDIO bus or a PHY. If the MAC is connected to
a PHY, only the PHY node needs to be described. The PHY can be controlled
by any interface, I2C, MDIO, or something else. If there's no PHY, the
fixed-link property would be used to describe the link.

> 
>> The only difference is the firmware of the ethernet
>> controller controls... What exactly does the firmware control that a Linux
>> driver would have controlled instead? Just configuring the link settings of
>> the MAC?
> 
> A MAC driver implements struct ethtool_ops:::get_link_settings and
> set_link_settings. For a MAC driver using phylib or phylink they
> typically then call into phylib or phylink to do the actual work,
> maybe with a bit of pre-processing in the MAC driver.
> 
> A MAC driver using firmware would typically make an RPC into the
> firmware to implement these calls.
> 
> There is a MAC driver currently under review which does not have a PHY
> at all. The MAC is directly connected to a switch, all within one
> IC. The link is always running at 5Gbps, the link is always up. It is
> physically impossible to connect a PHY, so get_link_settings just
> returns hard coded values.

The fixed-link property would be used to describe the link of the MAC here.

Arınç