netdev - [PATCH bpf v2 3/3] bpf: sockmap, add tests for MSG_F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230925202448.100920-4-john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:24:48 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: daniel@...earbox.net,
	ast@...nel.org,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	jakub@...udflare.com
Cc: john.fastabend@...il.com,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 3/3] bpf: sockmap, add tests for MSG_F_PEEK

Test that we can read with MSG_F_PEEK and then still get correct number
of available bytes through FIONREAD. The recv() (without PEEK) then
returns the bytes as expected. The recv() always worked though because
it was just the available byte reporting that was broke before latest
fixes.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
index 064cc5e8d9ad..e8eee2b8901e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
@@ -475,6 +475,56 @@ static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_fionread(bool pass_prog)
 		test_sockmap_drop_prog__destroy(drop);
 }
 
+
+static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek(void)
+{
+	int err, map, verdict, s, c1, p1, zero = 0, sent, recvd, avail;
+	struct test_sockmap_pass_prog *pass;
+	char snd[256] = "0123456789";
+	char rcv[256] = "0";
+
+	pass = test_sockmap_pass_prog__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(pass, "open_and_load"))
+		return;
+	verdict = bpf_program__fd(pass->progs.prog_skb_verdict);
+	map = bpf_map__fd(pass->maps.sock_map_rx);
+
+	err = bpf_prog_attach(verdict, map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
+		goto out;
+
+	s = socket_loopback(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM);
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(s, -1, "socket_loopback(s)"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = create_pair(s, AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, &c1, &p1);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "create_pairs(s)"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &c1, BPF_NOEXIST);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(c1)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	sent = xsend(p1, snd, sizeof(snd), 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(sent, sizeof(snd), "xsend(p1)");
+	recvd = recv(c1, rcv, sizeof(rcv), MSG_PEEK);
+	ASSERT_EQ(recvd, sizeof(rcv), "recv(c1)");
+	err = ioctl(c1, FIONREAD, &avail);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "ioctl(FIONREAD) error");
+	ASSERT_EQ(avail, sizeof(snd), "after peek ioctl(FIONREAD)");
+	recvd = recv(c1, rcv, sizeof(rcv), 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(recvd, sizeof(rcv), "recv(p0)");
+	err = ioctl(c1, FIONREAD, &avail);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "ioctl(FIONREAD) error");
+	ASSERT_EQ(avail, 0, "after read ioctl(FIONREAD)");
+
+out_close:
+	close(c1);
+	close(p1);
+out:
+	test_sockmap_pass_prog__destroy(pass);
+}
+
 void test_sockmap_basic(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap create_update_free"))
@@ -515,4 +565,6 @@ void test_sockmap_basic(void)
 		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_fionread(true);
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict fionread on drop"))
 		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_fionread(false);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict msg_f_peek"))
+		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek();
 }
-- 
2.33.0