lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230925094343.598c81d1@xps-13>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:43:43 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>, Stefan Schmidt
 <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Girault <david.girault@...vo.com>, Romuald
 Despres <romuald.despres@...vo.com>, Frederic Blain
 <frederic.blain@...vo.com>, Nicolas Schodet <nico@...fr.eu.org>, Guilhem
 Imberton <guilhem.imberton@...vo.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
 <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wpan-next v4 07/11] mac802154: Handle association
 requests from peers

Hi Alexander,

aahringo@...hat.com wrote on Sun, 24 Sep 2023 20:13:34 -0400:

> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:51 AM Miquel Raynal
> <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Coordinators may have to handle association requests from peers which
> > want to join the PAN. The logic involves:
> > - Acknowledging the request (done by hardware)
> > - If requested, a random short address that is free on this PAN should
> >   be chosen for the device.
> > - Sending an association response with the short address allocated for
> >   the peer and expecting it to be ack'ed.
> >
> > If anything fails during this procedure, the peer is considered not
> > associated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> >  include/net/cfg802154.h         |   7 ++
> >  include/net/ieee802154_netdev.h |   6 ++
> >  net/ieee802154/core.c           |   7 ++
> >  net/ieee802154/pan.c            |  30 +++++++
> >  net/mac802154/ieee802154_i.h    |   2 +
> >  net/mac802154/rx.c              |   8 ++
> >  net/mac802154/scan.c            | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  7 files changed, 202 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/cfg802154.h b/include/net/cfg802154.h
> > index 9b036ab20079..c844ae63bc04 100644
> > --- a/include/net/cfg802154.h
> > +++ b/include/net/cfg802154.h
> > @@ -583,4 +583,11 @@ struct ieee802154_pan_device *
> >  cfg802154_device_is_child(struct wpan_dev *wpan_dev,
> >                           struct ieee802154_addr *target);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * cfg802154_get_free_short_addr - Get a free address among the known devices
> > + * @wpan_dev: the wpan device
> > + * @return: a random short address expectedly unused on our PAN
> > + */
> > +__le16 cfg802154_get_free_short_addr(struct wpan_dev *wpan_dev);
> > +
> >  #endif /* __NET_CFG802154_H */
> > diff --git a/include/net/ieee802154_netdev.h b/include/net/ieee802154_netdev.h
> > index 16194356cfe7..4de858f9929e 100644
> > --- a/include/net/ieee802154_netdev.h
> > +++ b/include/net/ieee802154_netdev.h
> > @@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ struct ieee802154_association_req_frame {
> >         struct ieee802154_assoc_req_pl assoc_req_pl;
> >  };
> >
> > +struct ieee802154_association_resp_frame {
> > +       struct ieee802154_hdr mhr;
> > +       struct ieee802154_mac_cmd_pl mac_pl;
> > +       struct ieee802154_assoc_resp_pl assoc_resp_pl;
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct ieee802154_disassociation_notif_frame {
> >         struct ieee802154_hdr mhr;
> >         struct ieee802154_mac_cmd_pl mac_pl;
> > diff --git a/net/ieee802154/core.c b/net/ieee802154/core.c
> > index a08d75dd56ad..1670a71327a7 100644
> > --- a/net/ieee802154/core.c
> > +++ b/net/ieee802154/core.c
> > @@ -200,11 +200,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wpan_phy_free);
> >
> >  static void cfg802154_free_peer_structures(struct wpan_dev *wpan_dev)
> >  {
> > +       struct ieee802154_pan_device *child, *tmp;
> > +
> >         mutex_lock(&wpan_dev->association_lock);
> >
> >         kfree(wpan_dev->parent);
> >         wpan_dev->parent = NULL;
> >
> > +       list_for_each_entry_safe(child, tmp, &wpan_dev->children, node) {
> > +               list_del(&child->node);
> > +               kfree(child);
> > +       }
> > +
> >         mutex_unlock(&wpan_dev->association_lock);
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ieee802154/pan.c b/net/ieee802154/pan.c
> > index 9e1f1973c294..e99c64054dcb 100644
> > --- a/net/ieee802154/pan.c
> > +++ b/net/ieee802154/pan.c
> > @@ -73,3 +73,33 @@ cfg802154_device_is_child(struct wpan_dev *wpan_dev,
> >         return NULL;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cfg802154_device_is_child);
> > +
> > +__le16 cfg802154_get_free_short_addr(struct wpan_dev *wpan_dev)
> > +{
> > +       struct ieee802154_pan_device *child;
> > +       __le16 addr;
> > +
> > +       lockdep_assert_held(&wpan_dev->association_lock);
> > +
> > +       do {
> > +               get_random_bytes(&addr, 2);
> > +               if (addr == cpu_to_le16(IEEE802154_ADDR_SHORT_BROADCAST) ||
> > +                   addr == cpu_to_le16(IEEE802154_ADDR_SHORT_UNSPEC))
> > +                       continue;
> > +
> > +               if (wpan_dev->short_addr == addr)
> > +                       continue;
> > +
> > +               if (wpan_dev->parent && wpan_dev->parent->short_addr == addr)
> > +                       continue;
> > +
> > +               list_for_each_entry(child, &wpan_dev->children, node)
> > +                       if (child->short_addr == addr)
> > +                               continue;
> > +
> > +               break;
> > +       } while (1);
> > +  
> 
> I still believe that this random 2 bytes and check if it's already
> being used is wrong here. We need something to use the next free
> available number according to the data we are storing here.

This issue I still have in mind is when you have this typology:

device A -------> device B --------> device C <-------- device D
(leaf)            (coord)            (PAN coord)            (leaf)

B associates with C
A associates with B
D associates with C

If B and C run Linux's stack, they will always have the same short
address. Yes this can be handled (realignment procedure). But any time
this happens, you'll have a load of predictable realignments when A and
D get in range with B or C.

> However it is acceptable and can be changed later...

Ok.

Thanks,
Miquèl

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ