[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230925103057.104541-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:30:57 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] vringh: don't use vringh_kiov_advance() in vringh_iov_xfer()
In the while loop of vringh_iov_xfer(), `partlen` could be 0 if one of
the `iov` has 0 lenght.
In this case, we should skip the iov and go to the next one.
But calling vringh_kiov_advance() with 0 lenght does not cause the
advancement, since it returns immediately if asked to advance by 0 bytes.
Let's restore the code that was there before commit b8c06ad4d67d
("vringh: implement vringh_kiov_advance()"), avoiding using
vringh_kiov_advance().
Fixes: b8c06ad4d67d ("vringh: implement vringh_kiov_advance()")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
---
drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
index 955d938eb663..7b8fd977f71c 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
@@ -123,8 +123,18 @@ static inline ssize_t vringh_iov_xfer(struct vringh *vrh,
done += partlen;
len -= partlen;
ptr += partlen;
+ iov->consumed += partlen;
+ iov->iov[iov->i].iov_len -= partlen;
+ iov->iov[iov->i].iov_base += partlen;
- vringh_kiov_advance(iov, partlen);
+ if (!iov->iov[iov->i].iov_len) {
+ /* Fix up old iov element then increment. */
+ iov->iov[iov->i].iov_len = iov->consumed;
+ iov->iov[iov->i].iov_base -= iov->consumed;
+
+ iov->consumed = 0;
+ iov->i++;
+ }
}
return done;
}
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists