netdev - Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/7] net: macsec: indicate next pn update when offloading

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f8d79f01-38d6-9385-f213-b34779b8bb54@marvell.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:16:32 +0200
From: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>
To: "Radu Pirea (OSS)" <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>,
        Sabrina Dubroca
	<sd@...asysnail.net>,
        Dmitry Bezrukov <dbezrukov@...vell.com>
CC: <andrew@...n.ch>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        <sebastian.tobuschat@....nxp.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/7] net: macsec: indicate next pn
 update when offloading

Hi guys,

> On 21.09.2023 18:11, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
>> 2023-09-20, 12:22:33 +0300, Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) wrote:
>>> Indicate next PN update using update_pn flag in macsec_context.
>>> Offloaded MACsec implementations does not know whether or not the
>>> MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN attribute was passed for an SA update and assume
>>> that next PN should always updated, but this is not always true.
>>
>> This should probably go through net so that we can fix some drivers
>> that are currently doing the wrong thing. octeontx2 should be
>> fixable. atlantic looks like it would reset the PN to whatever was
>> read during the last dump, and it's unclear if that can be fixed
>> (AFAIU set_egress_sa_record writes the whole config at once).  mscc

Thats correct, atlantic hardware requires full table to be in data buffer registers.
I really doubt its possible to skip PN writing.

>> doesn't seem to modify the PN (even if requested -- should it should
>> reject the update), and mlx5 doesn't allow PN update (by storing the
>> initial value of next_pn on SA creation).
> 
> I updated octeontx2, mssc and mlx5. Atlantic is unclear.
> 
> Mark, Igor, in the atlantic MACsec driver, can the SAs be updated
> without a PN update?

Reviewed the code and the docs I have - my view is it can not.
All the packed record in macsec_api.c:set_egress_sa_record is expected by hardware in full.

Regards,
  Igor