[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230926105732.10864-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:57:32 +0000
From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
To: jreuter@...na.de,
ralf@...ux-mips.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ax25: Fix potential deadlock on &ax25_list_lock
Timer interrupt ax25_ds_timeout() could introduce double locks on
&ax25_list_lock.
ax25_ioctl()
--> ax25_ctl_ioctl()
--> ax25_dama_off()
--> ax25_dev_dama_off()
--> ax25_check_dama_slave()
--> spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock)
<timer interrupt>
--> ax25_ds_timeout()
--> spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock)
This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
developing for irq-related deadlock.
To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch use spin_lock_bh()
on &ax25_list_lock inside ax25_check_dama_slave().
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
---
net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c b/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
index f00e27df3c76..010b11303d32 100644
--- a/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
@@ -156,13 +156,13 @@ static int ax25_check_dama_slave(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
ax25_cb *ax25;
int res = 0;
- spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
ax25_for_each(ax25, &ax25_list)
if (ax25->ax25_dev == ax25_dev && (ax25->condition & AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE) && ax25->state > AX25_STATE_1) {
res = 1;
break;
}
- spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
return res;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists