lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:42:59 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: Johannes Nixdorf <jnixdorf-oss@....de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
	bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 5/6] net: bridge: Add a configurable default
 FDB learning limit

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 01:19:44PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> I'm not strongly against, just IMO it is unnecessary. I won't block the set
> because of this, but it would be nice to get input from others as
> well. If you can recompile your kernel to set a limit, it should be easier
> to change your app to set the same limit via netlink, but I'm not familiar
> with your use case.

I agree with keeping it out. We don't have it for similar knobs (e.g.,
MDB limits) and it would create a precedence for other bridge options
instead of simply using netlink and improving user space applications.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ