lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230927001103.5qgrwishmnxkyaul@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 03:11:03 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Paweł Dembicki <paweldembicki@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 6/8] net: dsa: vsc73xx: introduce tag 8021q
 for vsc73xx

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:55:29PM +0200, Paweł Dembicki wrote:
> > I've prepared some (only compile-tested) patches on this branch here:
> > https://github.com/vladimiroltean/linux/commits/pawel-dembicki-vsc73xx-v3
> >
> > I need to double-check that they don't introduce regressions,
> 
> I tested it on my device and I couldn't find any regressions. vlan
> filtering and tagging work as expected.

Thanks for testing. Obviously I still haven't :-/ Please feel free to
post the next version and I'll try to find some time to test.

> > and we
> > should discuss the merging strategy. Probably you're going to submit
> > them together with your patch set.
> 
> I prepared the v4 patch series. Please look if that format is ok with you.
> https://github.com/CHKDSK88/linux/commits/vsc73xx-vlan-net-next

I still have some style nitpicks similar to the ones expressed already,
but it isn't trivial for me to leave them through Github, so you can
post your best attempt at v4. You should also try to add a comment
explaining what's the reason for the special case for "if (port !=
CPU_PORT)" in vsc73xx_port_vlan_add().

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ