netdev - Re: [PATCH v6] net/core: Introduce netdev_core_stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+iT11qzCidTrHHRMQiYR-nXtbPNAUJGaEg0NQMCq_8CA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 17:44:29 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net/core: Introduce netdev_core_stats_inc()

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 5:40 PM Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/9/28 22:18, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:04 PM Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev> wrote:
> >> Although there is a kfree_skb_reason() helper function that can be used to
> >> find the reason why this skb is dropped, but most callers didn't increase
> >> one of rx_dropped, tx_dropped, rx_nohandler and rx_otherhost_dropped.
> >>
> >> For the users, people are more concerned about why the dropped in ip
> >> is increasing.
> >>
> >> Introduce netdev_core_stats_inc() for trace the caller of the dropped
> >> skb. Also, add __code to netdev_core_stats_alloc(), as it's called
> >> unlinkly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
> >> Suggested-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
> >> ---
> >> v6: merge netdev_core_stats and netdev_core_stats_inc together
> >> v5: Access the per cpu pointer before reach the relevant offset.
> >> v4: Introduce netdev_core_stats_inc() instead of export dev_core_stats_*_inc()
> >> v3: __cold should be added to the netdev_core_stats_alloc().
> >> v2: use __cold instead of inline in dev_core_stats().
> >> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230911082016.3694700-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev/
> >> ---
> >>   include/linux/netdevice.h | 21 ++++-----------------
> >>   net/core/dev.c            | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> >>   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> >> index 7e520c14eb8c..eb1fa04fbccc 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> >> @@ -4002,32 +4002,19 @@ static __always_inline bool __is_skb_forwardable(const struct net_device *dev,
> >>          return false;
> >>   }
> >>
> >> -struct net_device_core_stats __percpu *netdev_core_stats_alloc(struct net_device *dev);
> >> -
> >> -static inline struct net_device_core_stats __percpu *dev_core_stats(struct net_device *dev)
> >> -{
> >> -       /* This READ_ONCE() pairs with the write in netdev_core_stats_alloc() */
> >> -       struct net_device_core_stats __percpu *p = READ_ONCE(dev->core_stats);
> >> -
> >> -       if (likely(p))
> >> -               return p;
> >> -
> >> -       return netdev_core_stats_alloc(dev);
> >> -}
> >> +void netdev_core_stats_inc(struct net_device *dev, u32 offset);
> >>
> >>   #define DEV_CORE_STATS_INC(FIELD)                                              \
> >>   static inline void dev_core_stats_##FIELD##_inc(struct net_device *dev)                \
> >>   {                                                                              \
> >> -       struct net_device_core_stats __percpu *p;                               \
> >> -                                                                               \
> >> -       p = dev_core_stats(dev);                                                \
> >> -       if (p)                                                                  \
> >> -               this_cpu_inc(p->FIELD);                                         \
> > Note that we were using this_cpu_inc() which implied :
> > - IRQ safety, and
> > - a barrier paired with :
> >
> > net/core/dev.c:10548:                   storage->rx_dropped +=
> > READ_ONCE(core_stats->rx_dropped);
> > net/core/dev.c:10549:                   storage->tx_dropped +=
> > READ_ONCE(core_stats->tx_dropped);
> > net/core/dev.c:10550:                   storage->rx_nohandler +=
> > READ_ONCE(core_stats->rx_nohandler);
> > net/core/dev.c:10551:                   storage->rx_otherhost_dropped
> > += READ_ONCE(core_stats->rx_otherhost_dropped);
> >
> >
> >> +       netdev_core_stats_inc(dev,                                              \
> >> +                       offsetof(struct net_device_core_stats, FIELD));         \
> >>   }
> >>   DEV_CORE_STATS_INC(rx_dropped)
> >>   DEV_CORE_STATS_INC(tx_dropped)
> >>   DEV_CORE_STATS_INC(rx_nohandler)
> >>   DEV_CORE_STATS_INC(rx_otherhost_dropped)
> >> +#undef DEV_CORE_STATS_INC
> >>
> >>   static __always_inline int ____dev_forward_skb(struct net_device *dev,
> >>                                                 struct sk_buff *skb,
> >> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> >> index 606a366cc209..88a32c392c1d 100644
> >> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> >> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> >> @@ -10497,7 +10497,8 @@ void netdev_stats_to_stats64(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats64,
> >>   }
> >>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_stats_to_stats64);
> >>
> >> -struct net_device_core_stats __percpu *netdev_core_stats_alloc(struct net_device *dev)
> >> +static __cold struct net_device_core_stats __percpu *netdev_core_stats_alloc(
> >> +               struct net_device *dev)
> >>   {
> >>          struct net_device_core_stats __percpu *p;
> >>
> >> @@ -10510,7 +10511,19 @@ struct net_device_core_stats __percpu *netdev_core_stats_alloc(struct net_device
> >>          /* This READ_ONCE() pairs with the cmpxchg() above */
> >>          return READ_ONCE(dev->core_stats);
> >>   }
> >> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_core_stats_alloc);
> >> +
> >> +void netdev_core_stats_inc(struct net_device *dev, u32 offset)
> >> +{
> >> +       /* This READ_ONCE() pairs with the write in netdev_core_stats_alloc() */
> >> +       struct net_device_core_stats __percpu *p = READ_ONCE(dev->core_stats);
> >> +
> >> +       if (unlikely(!p))
> >> +               p = netdev_core_stats_alloc(dev);
> >> +
> >> +       if (p)
> >> +               (*(unsigned long *)((void *)this_cpu_ptr(p) + offset))++;
> > While here you are using a ++ operation that :
> >
> > - is not irq safe
> > - might cause store-tearing.
> >
> > I would suggest a preliminary patch converting the "unsigned long" fields in
> > struct net_device_core_stats to local_t
>
> Do you mean it needs to revert the commit 6510ea973d8d ("net: Use
> this_cpu_inc() to increment
>
> net->core_stats") first? But it would allocate memory which breaks on
> PREEMPT_RT.

I think I provided an (untested) alternative.

unsigned long __percpu *field = (__force unsigned long __percpu *)
((__force u8 *)p + offset);
this_cpu_inc(field);


>
> >
> > You might be able tweak this to
> >
> > unsigned long __percpu *field = (unsigned long __percpu) ((u8 *)p + offset);
> > this_cpu_inc(field);