| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABKxMyOzCnJuWJskLT2rm64r8tLH7VU8jHL308oZs6--XOcLnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 11:11:51 +0800
From: 黄杰 <huangjie.albert@...edance.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>, Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>, Jan Karcher <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>, Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: add support for
netdevice in containers.
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> 于2023年9月27日周三 13:55写道：
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:42:09AM +0800, Dust Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:35:45AM +0800, Albert Huang wrote:
> > >If the netdevice is within a container and communicates externally
> > >through network technologies like VXLAN, we won't be able to find
> > >routing information in the init_net namespace. To address this issue,
> >
> > Thanks for your founding !
> >
> > I think this is a more generic problem, but not just related to VXLAN ?
> > If we use SMC-R v2 and the netdevice is in a net namespace which is not
> > init_net, we should always fail, right ? If so, I'd prefer this to be a bugfix.
>
> BTW, does this patch take into account net namespace of ib_device?
>
> Thanks
>
As dust said, the ib_device works well.
bool rdma_dev_access_netns(const struct ib_device *dev, const struct net *net)
{
return (ib_devices_shared_netns ||
net_eq(read_pnet(&dev->coredev.rdma_net), net));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_dev_access_netns);
thanks!
BR
Albert.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Dust
> >
> > >we need to add a struct net parameter to the smc_ib_find_route function.
> > >This allow us to locate the routing information within the corresponding
> > >net namespace, ensuring the correct completion of the SMC CLC interaction.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Albert Huang <huangjie.albert@...edance.com>
> > >---
> > > net/smc/af_smc.c | 3 ++-
> > > net/smc/smc_ib.c | 7 ++++---
> > > net/smc/smc_ib.h | 2 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> > >index bacdd971615e..7a874da90c7f 100644
> > >--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> > >+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> > >@@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc,
> > > (struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm_v2 *)aclc;
> > > struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce =
> > > smc_get_clc_first_contact_ext(clc_v2, false);
> > >+ struct net *net = sock_net(&smc->sk);
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > if (!ini->first_contact_peer || aclc->hdr.version == SMC_V1)
> > >@@ -1210,7 +1211,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc,
> > > memcpy(ini->smcrv2.nexthop_mac, &aclc->r0.lcl.mac, ETH_ALEN);
> > > ini->smcrv2.uses_gateway = false;
> > > } else {
> > >- if (smc_ib_find_route(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr,
> > >+ if (smc_ib_find_route(net, smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr,
> > > smc_ib_gid_to_ipv4(aclc->r0.lcl.gid),
> > > ini->smcrv2.nexthop_mac,
> > > &ini->smcrv2.uses_gateway))
> > >diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.c b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> > >index 9b66d6aeeb1a..89981dbe46c9 100644
> > >--- a/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> > >+++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> > >@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ bool smc_ib_port_active(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport)
> > > return smcibdev->pattr[ibport - 1].state == IB_PORT_ACTIVE;
> > > }
> > >
> > >-int smc_ib_find_route(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> > >+int smc_ib_find_route(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> > > u8 nexthop_mac[], u8 *uses_gateway)
> > > {
> > > struct neighbour *neigh = NULL;
> > >@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ int smc_ib_find_route(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> > >
> > > if (daddr == cpu_to_be32(INADDR_NONE))
> > > goto out;
> > >- rt = ip_route_output_flow(&init_net, &fl4, NULL);
> > >+ rt = ip_route_output_flow(net, &fl4, NULL);
> > > if (IS_ERR(rt))
> > > goto out;
> > > if (rt->rt_uses_gateway && rt->rt_gw_family != AF_INET)
> > >@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ static int smc_ib_determine_gid_rcu(const struct net_device *ndev,
> > > if (smcrv2 && attr->gid_type == IB_GID_TYPE_ROCE_UDP_ENCAP &&
> > > smc_ib_gid_to_ipv4((u8 *)&attr->gid) != cpu_to_be32(INADDR_NONE)) {
> > > struct in_device *in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(ndev);
> > >+ struct net *net = dev_net(ndev);
> > > const struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
> > > bool subnet_match = false;
> > >
> > >@@ -248,7 +249,7 @@ static int smc_ib_determine_gid_rcu(const struct net_device *ndev,
> > > }
> > > if (!subnet_match)
> > > goto out;
> > >- if (smcrv2->daddr && smc_ib_find_route(smcrv2->saddr,
> > >+ if (smcrv2->daddr && smc_ib_find_route(net, smcrv2->saddr,
> > > smcrv2->daddr,
> > > smcrv2->nexthop_mac,
> > > &smcrv2->uses_gateway))
> > >diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.h b/net/smc/smc_ib.h
> > >index 4df5f8c8a0a1..ef8ac2b7546d 100644
> > >--- a/net/smc/smc_ib.h
> > >+++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.h
> > >@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ void smc_ib_sync_sg_for_device(struct smc_link *lnk,
> > > int smc_ib_determine_gid(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport,
> > > unsigned short vlan_id, u8 gid[], u8 *sgid_index,
> > > struct smc_init_info_smcrv2 *smcrv2);
> > >-int smc_ib_find_route(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> > >+int smc_ib_find_route(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> > > u8 nexthop_mac[], u8 *uses_gateway);
> > > bool smc_ib_is_valid_local_systemid(void);
> > > int smcr_nl_get_device(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb);
> > >--
> > >2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists