[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4e3fcc6-25b6-6c61-7736-485d3005372d@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 11:15:13 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: <edward.cree@....com>, <linux-net-drivers@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>, <sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com>,
<jdamato@...tly.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <mw@...ihalf.com>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <sgoutham@...vell.com>, <gakula@...vell.com>,
<sbhatta@...vell.com>, <hkelam@...vell.com>, <saeedm@...dia.com>,
<leon@...nel.org>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
<jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>, <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 1/7] net: move ethtool-related netdev state
into its own struct
On 9/27/2023 11:13 AM, edward.cree@....com wrote:
> From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
>
> net_dev->ethtool is a pointer to new struct ethtool_netdev_state, which
> currently contains only the wol_enabled field.
>
> Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
> ---
Good suggestion, nice to consolidate these bits I think.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists