| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202309300637.sTEZ8Sa9-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 06:52:32 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v2 1/3] xfrm: pass struct net to
xfrm_decode_session wrappers
Hi Florian,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on klassert-ipsec-next/master]
[also build test ERROR on klassert-ipsec/master netfilter-nf/main linus/master v6.6-rc3 next-20230929]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Florian-Westphal/xfrm-pass-struct-net-to-xfrm_decode_session-wrappers/20230929-210047
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230929125848.5445-2-fw%40strlen.de
patch subject: [PATCH ipsec-next v2 1/3] xfrm: pass struct net to xfrm_decode_session wrappers
config: um-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230930/202309300637.sTEZ8Sa9-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230930/202309300637.sTEZ8Sa9-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309300637.sTEZ8Sa9-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from net/ipv4/icmp.c:69:
In file included from include/linux/inet.h:42:
In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:43:
In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from net/ipv4/icmp.c:69:
In file included from include/linux/inet.h:42:
In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:43:
In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from net/ipv4/icmp.c:69:
In file included from include/linux/inet.h:42:
In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:43:
In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> net/ipv4/icmp.c:520:76: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 3, have 4
520 | err = xfrm_decode_session_reverse(net, skb_in, flowi4_to_flowi(&fl4_dec), AF_INET);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^~~~~~~
include/linux/socket.h:192:18: note: expanded from macro 'AF_INET'
192 | #define AF_INET 2 /* Internet IP Protocol */
| ^
include/net/xfrm.h:1299:19: note: 'xfrm_decode_session_reverse' declared here
1299 | static inline int xfrm_decode_session_reverse(struct sk_buff *skb,
| ^
12 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +520 net/ipv4/icmp.c
475
476 static struct rtable *icmp_route_lookup(struct net *net,
477 struct flowi4 *fl4,
478 struct sk_buff *skb_in,
479 const struct iphdr *iph,
480 __be32 saddr, u8 tos, u32 mark,
481 int type, int code,
482 struct icmp_bxm *param)
483 {
484 struct net_device *route_lookup_dev;
485 struct rtable *rt, *rt2;
486 struct flowi4 fl4_dec;
487 int err;
488
489 memset(fl4, 0, sizeof(*fl4));
490 fl4->daddr = (param->replyopts.opt.opt.srr ?
491 param->replyopts.opt.opt.faddr : iph->saddr);
492 fl4->saddr = saddr;
493 fl4->flowi4_mark = mark;
494 fl4->flowi4_uid = sock_net_uid(net, NULL);
495 fl4->flowi4_tos = RT_TOS(tos);
496 fl4->flowi4_proto = IPPROTO_ICMP;
497 fl4->fl4_icmp_type = type;
498 fl4->fl4_icmp_code = code;
499 route_lookup_dev = icmp_get_route_lookup_dev(skb_in);
500 fl4->flowi4_oif = l3mdev_master_ifindex(route_lookup_dev);
501
502 security_skb_classify_flow(skb_in, flowi4_to_flowi_common(fl4));
503 rt = ip_route_output_key_hash(net, fl4, skb_in);
504 if (IS_ERR(rt))
505 return rt;
506
507 /* No need to clone since we're just using its address. */
508 rt2 = rt;
509
510 rt = (struct rtable *) xfrm_lookup(net, &rt->dst,
511 flowi4_to_flowi(fl4), NULL, 0);
512 if (!IS_ERR(rt)) {
513 if (rt != rt2)
514 return rt;
515 } else if (PTR_ERR(rt) == -EPERM) {
516 rt = NULL;
517 } else
518 return rt;
519
> 520 err = xfrm_decode_session_reverse(net, skb_in, flowi4_to_flowi(&fl4_dec), AF_INET);
521 if (err)
522 goto relookup_failed;
523
524 if (inet_addr_type_dev_table(net, route_lookup_dev,
525 fl4_dec.saddr) == RTN_LOCAL) {
526 rt2 = __ip_route_output_key(net, &fl4_dec);
527 if (IS_ERR(rt2))
528 err = PTR_ERR(rt2);
529 } else {
530 struct flowi4 fl4_2 = {};
531 unsigned long orefdst;
532
533 fl4_2.daddr = fl4_dec.saddr;
534 rt2 = ip_route_output_key(net, &fl4_2);
535 if (IS_ERR(rt2)) {
536 err = PTR_ERR(rt2);
537 goto relookup_failed;
538 }
539 /* Ugh! */
540 orefdst = skb_in->_skb_refdst; /* save old refdst */
541 skb_dst_set(skb_in, NULL);
542 err = ip_route_input(skb_in, fl4_dec.daddr, fl4_dec.saddr,
543 RT_TOS(tos), rt2->dst.dev);
544
545 dst_release(&rt2->dst);
546 rt2 = skb_rtable(skb_in);
547 skb_in->_skb_refdst = orefdst; /* restore old refdst */
548 }
549
550 if (err)
551 goto relookup_failed;
552
553 rt2 = (struct rtable *) xfrm_lookup(net, &rt2->dst,
554 flowi4_to_flowi(&fl4_dec), NULL,
555 XFRM_LOOKUP_ICMP);
556 if (!IS_ERR(rt2)) {
557 dst_release(&rt->dst);
558 memcpy(fl4, &fl4_dec, sizeof(*fl4));
559 rt = rt2;
560 } else if (PTR_ERR(rt2) == -EPERM) {
561 if (rt)
562 dst_release(&rt->dst);
563 return rt2;
564 } else {
565 err = PTR_ERR(rt2);
566 goto relookup_failed;
567 }
568 return rt;
569
570 relookup_failed:
571 if (rt)
572 return rt;
573 return ERR_PTR(err);
574 }
575
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists