[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230930181320.GE92317@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 20:13:20 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...dia.com>
Cc: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
corbet@....net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, Jason@...c4.com,
djwong@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz, linyunsheng@...wei.com,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] pktgen: Automate flag enumeration for
unknown flag handling
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 09:18:08AM -0400, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> On 2023-09-28 13:21 +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:56:57PM +0800, Liang Chen wrote:
> > > When specifying an unknown flag, it will print all available flags.
> > > Currently, these flags are provided as fixed strings, which requires
> > > manual updates when flags change. Replacing it with automated flag
> > > enumeration.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...dia.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes from v3:
> > > - check "n == IPSEC_SHIFT" instead of string comparison
> > > - use snprintf and check that the result does not overrun pkg_dev->result[]
> > > - avoid double '\n' at the end
>
> ^
>
> [...]
>
> > > - } else {
> > > - sprintf(pg_result,
> > > - "Flag -:%s:- unknown\nAvailable flags, (prepend ! to un-set flag):\n%s",
> > > - f,
> > > - "IPSRC_RND, IPDST_RND, UDPSRC_RND, UDPDST_RND, "
> > > - "MACSRC_RND, MACDST_RND, TXSIZE_RND, IPV6, "
> > > - "MPLS_RND, VID_RND, SVID_RND, FLOW_SEQ, "
> > > - "QUEUE_MAP_RND, QUEUE_MAP_CPU, UDPCSUM, "
> > > - "NO_TIMESTAMP, "
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> > > - "IPSEC, "
> > > -#endif
> > > - "NODE_ALLOC\n");
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(pg_result, "OK: flags=0x%x", pkt_dev->flags);
> > > return count;
> > > }
> > > - sprintf(pg_result, "OK: flags=0x%x", pkt_dev->flags);
> > > +
> > > + /* Unknown flag */
> > > + end = pkt_dev->result + sizeof(pkt_dev->result);
> > > + pg_result += sprintf(pg_result,
> > > + "Flag -:%s:- unknown\n"
> > > + "Available flags, (prepend ! to un-set flag):\n", f);
> > > +
> > > + for (int n = 0; n < NR_PKT_FLAGS && pg_result < end; n++) {
> > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XFRM) && n == IPSEC_SHIFT)
> > > + continue;
> > > + pg_result += snprintf(pg_result, end - pg_result,
> > > + "%s, ", pkt_flag_names[n]);
> > > + }
> > > + if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(pg_result >= end)) {
> > > + /* Remove the comma and whitespace at the end */
> > > + *(pg_result - 2) = '\0';
> >
> > Hi Liang Chen,
> >
> > Should the string have a trailing '\n' in keeping with the current formatting?
>
> A '\n' is already added when the string is output by pktgen_if_show() so
> if the string above has a trailing '\n', it leads to an empty line in
> the output.
>
> If my count is correct, before this patch there are 56 cases that output
> to pkt_dev->result/pg_result in pktgen_if_write() and only 3 of them
> include a trailing '\n', arguably by mistake.
>
> So, I think it's better to remove the empty line than to keep the
> current formatting.
Thanks for the clarification.
I have no further objections, but if the patch is resupn for some other
reason, then it might be worth mentioning this in the patch description.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists