netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] NFSD: convert write_threads, write_maxblksize and write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZRmk14sd+3gXfJ3N@lore-desk>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 18:56:55 +0200
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, jlayton@...nel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] NFSD: convert write_threads, write_maxblksize and
 write_maxconn to netlink commands

[...]
> > 
> > This code is wrong... but then the original in write_maxblksize is wrong
> > to, so you can't be blamed.
> > nfsd_max_blksize applies to nfsd in ALL network namespaces.  So if we
> > need to check there are no active services in one namespace, we need to
> > check the same for *all* namespaces.
> 
> Yes, the original code does look strange and is probably incorrect
> with regard to its handling of the mutex. Shall we explore and fix
> that issue in the nfsctl code first so that it can be backported to
> stable kernels?
> 
> 
> > I think we should make nfsd_max_blksize a per-namespace value.
> 
> That is a different conversation.
> 
> First, the current name of this tunable is incongruent with its
> actual function, which is to specify the maximum network buffer size
> that is allocated when the NFSD service pool is created. We should
> find a more descriptive and specific name for this element in the
> netlink protocol.
> 
> Second, it does seem like a candidate for becoming namespace-
> specific, but TBH I'm not familiar enough with its current user
> space consumers to know if that change would be welcome or fraught.
> 
> Since more discussion, research, and possibly a fix are needed, we
> might drop max_blksize from this round and look for one or two
> other tunables to convert for the first round.

ack. Are write_unlock_ip() and/or write_unlock_fs() good candidates?

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> 
> > > +
> > > +	nfsd_max_blksize = nla_get_u32(attr);
> > > +	nfsd_max_blksize = max_t(int, nfsd_max_blksize, 1024);
> > > +	nfsd_max_blksize = min_t(int, nfsd_max_blksize, NFSSVC_MAXBLKSIZE);
> > > +	nfsd_max_blksize &= ~1023;
> > > +out:
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&nfsd_mutex);
> > > +
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * nfsd_nl_max_blksize_get_dumpit - dump the nfs block size
> > > + * @skb: reply buffer
> > > + * @cb: netlink metadata and command arguments
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns the size of the reply or a negative errno.
> > > + */
> > > +int nfsd_nl_max_blksize_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > +				   struct netlink_callback *cb)
> > > +{
> > > +	return nfsd_nl_get_dump(skb, cb, NFSD_CMD_MAX_BLKSIZE_GET,
> > > +				NFSD_A_CONTROL_PLANE_MAX_BLKSIZE,
> > > +				nfsd_max_blksize);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * nfsd_nl_max_conn_set_doit - set the max number of connections
> > > + * @skb: reply buffer
> > > + * @info: netlink metadata and command arguments
> > > + *
> > > + * Return 0 on success or a negative errno.
> > > + */
> > > +int nfsd_nl_max_conn_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(genl_info_net(info), nfsd_net_id);
> > > +	struct nlattr *attr = info->attrs[NFSD_A_CONTROL_PLANE_MAX_CONN];
> > > +
> > > +	if (!attr)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	nn->max_connections = nla_get_u32(attr);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * nfsd_nl_max_conn_get_dumpit - dump the max number of connections
> > > + * @skb: reply buffer
> > > + * @cb: netlink metadata and command arguments
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns the size of the reply or a negative errno.
> > > + */
> > > +int nfsd_nl_max_conn_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > +				struct netlink_callback *cb)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(sock_net(cb->skb->sk), nfsd_net_id);
> > > +
> > > +	return nfsd_nl_get_dump(skb, cb, NFSD_CMD_MAX_CONN_GET,
> > > +				NFSD_A_CONTROL_PLANE_MAX_CONN,
> > > +				nn->max_connections);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * nfsd_net_init - Prepare the nfsd_net portion of a new net namespace
> > >   * @net: a freshly-created network namespace

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)