netdev - Re: [PATCH] tipc: Fix uninit-value access in __tipc_nl_bearer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231001174739.GS92317@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 19:47:39 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
Cc: jmaloy@...hat.com, ying.xue@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	syzbot+9425c47dccbcb4c17d51@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tipc: Fix uninit-value access in
 __tipc_nl_bearer_enable()

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 09:51:20PM +0900, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue:
> 
> =====================================================
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in strscpy+0xc4/0x160
>  strscpy+0xc4/0x160
>  bearer_name_validate net/tipc/bearer.c:147 [inline]
>  tipc_enable_bearer net/tipc/bearer.c:259 [inline]
>  __tipc_nl_bearer_enable+0x634/0x2220 net/tipc/bearer.c:1043
>  tipc_nl_bearer_enable+0x3c/0x70 net/tipc/bearer.c:1052
>  genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:971 [inline]
>  genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1051 [inline]
>  genl_rcv_msg+0x11ec/0x1290 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1066
>  netlink_rcv_skb+0x371/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545
>  genl_rcv+0x40/0x60 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1075
>  netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342 [inline]
>  netlink_unicast+0xf47/0x1250 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1368
>  netlink_sendmsg+0x1238/0x13d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910
>  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
>  sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:753 [inline]
>  ____sys_sendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2540
>  ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2594
>  __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2623 [inline]
>  __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2632 [inline]
>  __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2630 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2630
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> 
> Uninit was created at:
>  slab_post_alloc_hook+0x12f/0xb70 mm/slab.h:767
>  slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline]
>  kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x577/0xa80 mm/slub.c:3523
>  kmalloc_reserve+0x148/0x470 net/core/skbuff.c:559
>  __alloc_skb+0x318/0x740 net/core/skbuff.c:644
>  alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1286 [inline]
>  netlink_alloc_large_skb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1214 [inline]
>  netlink_sendmsg+0xb34/0x13d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1885
>  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
>  sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:753 [inline]
>  ____sys_sendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2540
>  ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2594
>  __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2623 [inline]
>  __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2632 [inline]
>  __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2630 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2630
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> 
> Bearer names must be null-terminated strings. If a bearer name which is not
> null-terminated is passed through netlink, strcpy() and similar functions
> can cause buffer overrun. This causes the above issue.
> 
> This patch fixes this issue by returning -EINVAL if a non-null-terminated
> bearer name is passed.
> 
> Fixes: 0655f6a8635b ("tipc: add bearer disable/enable to new netlink api")
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+9425c47dccbcb4c17d51@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9425c47dccbcb4c17d51
> Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>