[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8577c007-556f-4fca-8b74-075399223f06@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 08:50:01 +0300
From: "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@...el.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Prasad Koya <prasad@...sta.com>, "Andrew
Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <dumazet@...gle.com>,
<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Lifshits, Vitaly" <vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [iwl-net] Revert "igc: set TP bit in 'supported' and
'advertising' fields of ethtool_link_ksettings"
On 30/09/2023 19:17, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Prasad Koya wrote:
>> This reverts commit 9ac3fc2f42e5ffa1e927dcbffb71b15fa81459e2.
>>
>> After the command "ethtool -s enps0 speed 100 duplex full autoneg on",
>> i.e., advertise only 100Mbps speed to the peer, "ethtool enps0" shows
>> advertised speeds as 100Mbps and 2500Mbps. Same behavior is seen
>> when changing the speed to 10Mbps or 1000Mbps.
>>
>> This applies to I225/226 parts, which only supports copper mode.
>> Reverting to original till the ambiguity is resolved.
>>
>> Fixes: 9ac3fc2f42e5 ("igc: set TP bit in 'supported' and
>> 'advertising' fields of ethtool_link_ksettings")
>
> nit: I don't think it is correct to linewrap Fixes tags.
Simon, we decided not to recall this patch and will submit another one.
(resolve 2500M and TP advertisement ambiguity).
>
>> Signed-off-by: Prasad Koya <prasad@...sta.com>
>
> ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists